Examples of 'appellant argued' in a sentence
Meaning of "appellant argued"
appellant argued: This phrase is often used in legal contexts to describe the action of presenting a case, defense, or argument to a higher court or authority for review or reconsideration
How to use "appellant argued" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
appellant argued
The appellant argued that it was the exporter.
It is not, as counsel for the Appellant argued strenuously, an investigation into " wrongdoing ".
The appellant argued that the trial judge.
Counsel for the appellant argued that the goods in issue are not dietetic food.
The appellant argued that interviews should have been held.
ARGUMENTS Counsel for the appellant argued first on the question of designers ' installation costs.
The appellant argued that this was perverse and capricious.
Counsel for the appellant argued that the appellant sold computer components to its customers.
The appellant argued that the mark should be still higher.
Counsel for the appellant argued that Puerto Rico is not " the United States . ".
The appellant argued that there was a difference between attending and marking.
Therefore, the appellant argued that the respondent had incorrectly denied its refund claim.
The appellant argued that this weighting was contrary to the merit principle.
Counsel for the appellant argued that the filters are " parts " within the meaning of Code 2482.
The appellant argued that she became incapacitated during the examination.
See also
The appellant argued that a reasonable person would consider his appeal to be timely.
The appellant argued that he deserved an additional two marks for his response.
The appellant argued that she perceived these remarks as attempts to intimidate her.
The appellant argued that the reference provided by her supervisor was not accurate.
The appellant argued that nitrogen is essential to the nature and functioning of these products.
The appellant argued that the decision should have been reviewed on a reasonableness simpliciter standard.
The appellant argued that during disclosure he had been refused information related to these appointments.
The appellant argued that these answers were not consistent with the expected answers.
The appellant argued that an advisor to a director general might have influenced the selection board.
The appellant argued that she provided reasonable answers to the questions asked at the interview.
The appellant argued that the acting positions were offered to the top two successful candidates.
The appellant argued that her response covered the same points but in different words.
The appellant argued that these results confirmed that the pass mark was not precisely established.
The appellant argued that she should have received more than one point for her answer.
The appellant argued that the electric utility brings energy to the HPS lamp.
The appellant argued that Nicole Reynolds should not have been screened into the process.
The appellant argued that the requirements outlined in the Greaves decision had not been met.
The appellant argued that he should have received the maximum mark of 4.
The appellant argued that, for him, further surgery did amount to imminent peril.
The appellant argued that, in order to be considered a feed, the preparation must provide nutrients.
The appellant argued that the respondent 's pleadings do not establish a prima facie case.
The appellant argued that the knives in issue are not weapons, but common fishing knives.
The appellant argued the case of Hassall4 in support of her position.
The appellant argued that a question relating to HRDC 's vision had an incorrect expected answer.
The appellant argued that Ms. Pedden did not possess this experience.
The appellant argued that the presentation of form B 3B constituted the interim accounting.
The appellant argued that Mr. Rendace and Mr. DiFelice had been appointed to new positions.
The appellant argued that Information Technology was a work function, not an Organizational or a Geographic element.
The appellant argued that the term " exterminate " used in this passage really meant " deport.
The appellant argued that the card shufflers are " [ o ] ther office machines ".
The appellant argued that it is entitled to a refund pursuant to section 68.2 of the Act.
But, the appellant argued that subsection 32 ( 2 ) of the Act created an exception to this rule.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Argued
Show more
We have already argued about the sweatshirt
We argued that was not essential to the facts
I am sorry you argued with your friend
Examples of using Appellant
Show more
The appellant appeals against that application
It also or dered the appellant to provide security
The appellant had therefore suffered no injustice
