Examples of 'appellants' in a sentence
Meaning of "appellants"
Appellant: a person who applies to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court. Example: The appellant presented strong arguments in favor of overturning the verdict
Show more definitions
- plural of appellant
How to use "appellants" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
appellants
The appellants appealed against that decision.
At the trial both the appellants were acquitted.
Most appellants did indeed invoke this fact.
To recognize the claims of the appellants under s.
Invoked by the appellants in support of their appeals.
Her testimony was not refuted by the appellants.
The appellants are ordered to pay the costs.
There is no change to how unrepresented appellants are scheduled.
Order the appellants to pay the costs.
This evidence was not contradicted by the appellants.
Appellants contend that there was no public hearing.
To these the appellants wish to add a fifth.
Appellants do not believe this was a fair competition.
Unquestionably the rights claimed by appellants are important.
The appellants appeared on their own behalf.
See also
The appellant was one of the two appellants.
The appellants presented their own cases.
Three allegations were presented on behalf of the appellants.
The appellants were at a disadvantage in the selection process.
This fact was not challenged by the appellants.
The appellants did not attend the hearing.
That application was also contested by the appellants.
The appellants fail the written exam.
He had no motive to falsely implicate the appellants.
The appellants do not attack the finding.
The first allegation by the appellants is therefore allowed.
Both appellants failed on the knowledge factor.
The clothes worn by the appellants were also recovered.
Appellants argue that these conclusions were erroneous.
Each of the appellants also testified.
Appellants want and expect a favourable decision.
And stroking the appellants and congratulate them.
Appellants are entitled to know when to expect a decision.
Assessment that the appellants occupied a dominant position.
Appellants denied the charge against them.
Counsel for the appellants did not question this.
Appellants did not advance a legal principle.
This is what the appellants were told.
The appellants are importers of bottled iced tea.
They knew both appellants were addicts.
The appellants did not enjoy a right of appeal.
Months nbs to each of the appellants.
The appellants contended that this was not done.
It quashed a number of the convictions against both appellants.
The appellants were outside of that area of selection.
Costs were awarded against the appellants.
The appellants presented their own case.
That was not challenged by the appellants.
The appellants also filed briefs in reply.
It follows that the decision concerns the appellants.
