Examples of 'counter-opinion' in a sentence
Meaning of "counter-opinion"
Counter-opinion is a noun that refers to an alternative or opposing viewpoint to the one presented
How to use "counter-opinion" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
counter-opinion
Examination of the Counter-Opinion and vote.
In accordance with the result of voting on the Counter-Opinion.
Considerations of the counter-Opinion and voting on it.
The following members voted against the Counter-Opinion.
The counter-Opinion would lead to a general system of insurance for services.
Reasons for submitting the Counter-Opinion.
The counter-opinion therefore became a Committee opinion.
He presented the following counter-opinion.
Mr LUSTENHOUWER spoke against the counter-Opinion, the counter-Opinion was too favourably disposed towards the Commission.
The following members voted for the Counter-Opinion.
In this case, the member who drafted the counter-opinion had submitted a declaration upon his appointment.
Result of the roll call vote on the Counter-Opinion.
The Ombudsman observes that a counter-opinion is not a simple or partial amendment.
He asked group members to vote against the counter-opinion.
Mr FRERICHS asked for his counter-Opinion to be put to a vote.
See also
He disagreed with the selective approach proposed in the counter-opinion.
The rapporteur opposed the counter-opinion presented by Ms Persson.
Replace the whole of the section opinion by the following counter-opinion.
However, a draft counter-opinion has been drawn up.
He personally suggested both the opinion and the counter-opinion be rejected.
The counter-opinion was withdrawn.
He didn't have to respond directly to that one comment to offer a counter-opinion.
The counter-opinion was adopted by 12 votes to seven with one abstention.
He requested those members who had submitted a counter-opinion to withdraw their opinion.
Mr Sepi regretted the resigning rapporteur 's premature announcement that he would be submitting a counter-opinion.
Mr Lindmark announced a number of amendments or a counter-opinion for the plenary session.
In July, Mr Hernández Bataller presented other amendments, which were not deemed to constitute a counter-opinion.
Georges Cingal questioned the timeliness of the counter-opinion that had been submitted.
Mr GIACOMELLI thought the discussion should no longer be about the explanations behind the Counter-Opinion.
Discussion of the counter-Opinion.
A counter-opinion ( submitted by Group I representatives ) was appended to the EESC opinion.
Mr Beirnaert presented the following amendment counter-opinion.
Moreover, Mr Levitt had tabled a counter-opinion on the subject, so confusion might arise.
Mr Nyberg voiced his dissent with the counter-opinion.
Nothing is quantified in the counter-opinion e.g. alternatives, employment.
Mr Retureau expressed his disagreement with the counter-opinion.
A nominal vote was held and the counter-Opinion was defeated by 65 votes to 60 with 7 abstentions.
Mr Walker expressed his support for the counter-opinion.
Mr Ranocchiari said that Article 110, mentioned in the counter-opinion ( full liberalisation ), contained a transitional provision point 2.
Mr Adams explained why he had written the counter-opinion.
He also asked Mr Adams to present the counter-opinion of which he was co-author.
Mr Koopman said that he is presenting the reasons for a counter-opinion.
For this reason, the rapporteur was opposed to the counter-opinion tabled by Mr Nyberg.
After a discussion the Group decided to back this amendment as a Group counter-opinion.
The Bureau also took note of the tabling of a counter-opinion by Group I on opinion SOC/194.
The opinion adopted by the EESC was submitted at the plenary session as a counter-opinion.
The president decided to begin with discussion of the counter-opinion tabled by Mr Braghin.
Mr Adams regarded the opinion to be one-sided and would put forward a counter-opinion.
Presentation of the counter-opinion.
Ms Persson then took the floor to explain the motives for her counter-opinion.
