Examples of 'differences between groups' in a sentence
Meaning of "differences between groups"
differences between groups: This phrase refers to variations, distinctions, or contrasts that exist between different sets of people, organizations, or entities. It often highlights the diversity or disparities between various groups in terms of characteristics, behaviors, or beliefs
How to use "differences between groups" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
differences between groups
That there are differences between groups is indisputable.
The histopathological analysis evidenced differences between groups.
The differences between groups were also insignificant.
Significance level to show differences between groups was p.
Differences between groups were verified for each evaluation.
No other significant differences between groups were observed.
Differences between groups can be troublesome.
But it shows that the differences between groups.
These differences between groups were significant.
There were no significant differences between groups in.
Potential differences between groups of households were also considered.
Health disparities reflect on differences between groups of people.
The differences between groups varied depending on the task.
Statistics almost always showed up differences between groups.
Quantitative differences between groups on the language tests.
See also
differences between different
differences between european
differences between human
differences between individual
differences between european
differences between human
differences between individual
Univariate analysis were performed to assess differences between groups.
There were no differences between groups at baseline.
Proponents argue it may also explain differences between groups.
There are differences between groups in the connections.
Measures taken to eliminate welfare differences between groups of children.
Significant differences between groups were assessed by analysis of variance.
These simple averages mask important differences between groups.
There were no differences between groups for others outcomes.
Results did not indicate clinically meaningful differences between groups.
Material differences between groups of people.
Histopathological analysis suggested the lack of significant differences between groups.
There were no obvious differences between groups in vital signs.
Differences between groups became apparent in the first year of treatment.
There were no differences between groups.
Differences between groups according to time were tested by the interaction term.
There were no significant differences between groups on other outcome measures.
The other variables showed no statistically significant differences between groups.
Systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined.
The study did not find significant differences between groups.
There were no differences between groups in the experience of side effects.
But a more detailed analysis shows large differences between groups.
Proportional differences between groups were considered statistically significant in all measures.
There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any of the assessments.
These differences between groups were statistically significant and clinically significant.
There were observed significant differences between groups concerning narrative content.
The differences between groups were statistically significant for most comorbidities.
There were no significant differences between groups for either variable.
No differences between groups in the production or quality of breast milk were detected.
There were no significant differences between groups for object recognition.
Analysis of variance by repeated measures was applied to calculate differences between groups.
There were no significant differences between groups in the remaining variables.
The multivariate analyses confirmed a few statistically significant differences between groups.
There were no significant differences between groups in four other fear tests.
No differences between groups were observed for isozyme patterns and ATPase activity of myosin.
Statistical analysis to test significant differences between groups used non parametric tests.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Differences
Show more
Now the differences are less and less
I wish to apologize for the differences we had
Gender differences in performance on the science scale
Examples of using Groups
Show more
Armed groups also stand accused of torture
The most significant groups are the following
The groups meet three times a year
