Examples of 'have weapons of mass' in a sentence
Meaning of "have weapons of mass"
have weapons of mass: This phrase refers to possessing weapons capable of causing widespread destruction or casualties, typically referring to nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons
How to use "have weapons of mass" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
have weapons of mass
They probably have weapons of mass destruction.
There is a problem there . They are allies and they have weapons of mass destruction.
But humans have weapons of mass destruction.
And when there have been wars we did not have weapons of mass destruction.
They have weapons of mass destruction ; that is what this war was about.
They are allies and they have weapons of mass destruction.
And he will have weapons of mass destruction, which Saddam did not have.
Cuba does not have and never will have weapons of mass destruction.
Many nations have weapons of mass destruction.
Iraq, it has already been established, does not have weapons of mass destruction.
Unlike Iraq, they do have weapons of mass destruction or will have them very soon.
Narrator, but on the central question, does saddam hussein have weapons of mass destruction?
They should not have weapons of mass destruction.
The data showed that he would likely have weapons of mass destruction.
Knows that they have weapons of mass destruction.
See also
Should we invade Iraq because they may have weapons of mass destruction?
These terrorists have weapons of mass destruction.
There's a problem there. They're allies and they have weapons of mass destruction. Oh no!
The fact that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction was not important.
Everyone knew that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
The … we know they have weapons of mass destruction.
Team, if the Dekaderkastanies have weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam Hussein have weapons of mass destruction? ”.
Meaning Saddam definitely does not have weapons of mass destruction or he may not.
Why would you want to have weapons of mass destruction?
Why are some countries allowed to have weapons of mass destruction while others are not?
Meaning Saddam definitely does not have weapons of mass destruction or he may not . - No.
By that time, North Korea will have weapons of mass destruction.
Hey, iraq, sorry you did not have weapons of mass destruction.
The U.K. knows that they have weapons of mass destruction.
The first question is, does Iraq have weapons of mass destruction?
Question, Does Iraq have weapons of mass destruction?
Today, 32 countries have weapons of mass destruction.
Do not the " bad guys " have weapons of mass destruction?
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Weapons
Show more
Weapons come in all shapes and sizes
We possess the weapons used in his capture
Weapons have never been part of that equation
Examples of using Have
Show more
These documents have been in my family for centuries
Have this done by the customer service only
He could not have chosen a worse time
Examples of using Mass
Show more
Po is the unladen mass of the tractor alone
Mass starvation is no longer a concern in the region
Restrictions on the mass media freedom of reporting
