Examples of 'it was reviewed' in a sentence
Meaning of "it was reviewed"
The phrase 'it was reviewed' indicates that something has undergone a review or assessment process. This could refer to various scenarios, such as a product being evaluated by experts, a document being examined for accuracy or quality, or a performance being critiqued by reviewers. The phrase suggests that an analysis or appraisal has taken place to evaluate the subject in question
How to use "it was reviewed" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
it was reviewed
It was reviewed by the most appropriate grants panel.
The draft document was distributed and it was reviewed and discussed.
It was reviewed by a parliamentary committee last year.
Once a request had been made it was reviewed by the Ministry of Justice.
It was reviewed in a number of scholarly journals.
Her Worship provided a response and it was reviewed by the committee.
I think it was reviewed in the context of just being a big franchise movie.
Nikola Bogdanovski accepted the idea after it was reviewed by the board of directors.
It was reviewed extensively by media outlets including Time magazine.
After objections of many women activists, it was reviewed by MoJ.
It was reviewed extensively in the British press.
Annex 1 shows the questionnaire in the format with which it was reviewed.
It was reviewed favourably on both sides of the Atlantic.
Information was received from several sources ; it was reviewed and reflected on the system.
It was reviewed in an earlier edition of JANUS.
See also
Don't dismiss the book because it was reviewed by Weber.
It was reviewed in both the Age and Argus newspapers.
Jack Kerouac wrote the introduction, and it was reviewed by Dorothy Parker in Esquire magazine.
It was reviewed by Variety.
And there, it was reviewed by five independent referees.
It was reviewed positively by critics and was viewed across the United States.
I know that it was reviewed and that a different decision, or different determination, was made.
It was reviewed by federal agencies and a panel of the National Academy of Sciences.
And there, it was reviewed by five independent referees, and it was published.
It was reviewed in Time.
In the UK it was reviewed by The Guardian, as "honest and insightful.
It was reviewed in August.
And there, it was reviewed by five independent referees, and it was published . ( Applause ) Applause.
It was reviewed in Fanfare.
It was reviewed and edited by Michael van Gelderen of OHCHR.
It was reviewed by Gladstone in the Nineteenth Century.
It was reviewed by Maurice Baumont in the journal Revue historique.
It was reviewed by Sir Jeremy Greenstock later the same year.
It was reviewed in Philosophical Transactions xii.
It was reviewed by Kirkus Reviews.
It was reviewed in The Telegraph.
It was reviewed by The Spectator.
Then, it was reviewed by two more judges with experience in phonetic and perceptual analysis.
It was reviewed by Secretariat departments and offices, and their comments were incorporated as appropriate.
It was reviewed in Aftenposten, where the critic described it as shocking and unappetizing.
It was reviewed as being " more spiteful than … previous albums.
It was reviewed in a lot of fan'zines worldwide and got a pretty rapturous appreciation { 4.
It was reviewed twice,.
It was reviewed in the ' Komunist.
It was reviewed positively, and was compared to games such as Super Mario 64.
It was reviewed by CNN in this article,.
It was reviewed well, except in Galaxy.
It was reviewed as " a coherent and much-needed refutation of Von Däniken 's theories.
It was reviewed by the Organic Consumers Association ( OCA ), which concluded the following,.
It was reviewed together with the activities of the UN / EDIFACT MD6.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Reviewed
Show more
These assumptions were reviewed in this current period
A reviewed and updated space plan is being prepared
Records are generally reviewed every three months
