Examples of 'non-nuclear-weapon' in a sentence
Meaning of "non-nuclear-weapon"
non-nuclear-weapon (noun) - a weapon that does not rely on nuclear fission or fusion to achieve its destructive power. This term is often used in the context of arms control and disarmament discussions
How to use "non-nuclear-weapon" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
non-nuclear-weapon
Conclusion of effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon states against the.
Assure non-nuclear-weapon states against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.
Report of the ad hoc committee on effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon states against.
The protection of non-nuclear-weapon states from use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.
Other issues it will discuss include nuclear disarmament and security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon states.
Many non-nuclear-weapon states have been reluctant to embrace any of these proposals for varying reasons.
The issue of security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States deserved serious attention.
The non-nuclear-weapon states were allowed to develop nuclear technology but only for peaceful purposes.
Our nuclear doctrine provides negative security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States.
Non-nuclear-weapon States are already bound by a de facto treaty with verification.
Most proposals concerning nuclear disarmament were tabled by the non-nuclear-weapon States.
Non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other.
The same is true of negative security assurances towards non-nuclear-weapon States.
Zimbabwe is a non-nuclear-weapon State and has no ambitions to acquire such weapons.
We subscribe to the urgency of strengthening security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon States.
See also
No non-nuclear-weapon State should engage in the proliferation of deadly nuclear arms.
Legally binding measures on security assurances to address concerns of non-nuclear-weapon States.
The non-nuclear-weapon States feel especially threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons.
There was a need for legally binding security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States.
Those commitments provided the non-nuclear-weapon States with the assurances they sought.
Pakistan was therefore not in a position to accede to the NPT as a non-nuclear-weapon State.
The question of security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States had not yet been resolved.
We support the conclusion of international agreements to give guarantees to the non-nuclear-weapon States.
Threats to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States in certain circumstances must be disavowed.
This is considered as another tangible benefit of the Treaty for non-nuclear-weapon states.
Non-nuclear-weapon States for their part agreed not to seek or develop nuclear weapons.
It must be built on the requirements of nuclear and non-nuclear-weapon States alike.
Non-nuclear-weapon States needed assurances against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.
Doctrines advocating winnable nuclear wars against non-nuclear-weapon States are not tenable.
Australia urges all non-nuclear-weapon States to provide this information to IAEA on a timely basis.
The issue of legally binding security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States is a complex issue.
The non-nuclear-weapon States parties had the right to demand credible security assurances.
Another important nuclear issue is that of security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon States.
China understands the concerns of the non-nuclear-weapon States on the question of nuclear tests.
We will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Establishment of safeguards for non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or threat of such weapons.
It proved possible owing to further convergence of positions among the non-nuclear-weapon States.
We also support the demand from non-nuclear-weapon States for binding security assurances.
There was still stalemate on the issue of providing security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States.
One complicating factor was that not all non-nuclear-weapon States were in the same position.
Non-nuclear-weapon States must receive negative security guarantees through a binding international instrument.
A binding treaty on positive and negative security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States was needed.
There is also a bargain between non-nuclear-weapon States to never seek or acquire nuclear weapons.
The issue of negative security assurances is a matter of paramount importance for non-nuclear-weapon States.
They would bolster the non-nuclear-weapon States in their decision to follow a humanist path.
Conclusion of effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or.
Non-nuclear-weapon States should be able to harness nuclear technology for a wide range of peaceful uses.
International arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear.
Pursue the consideration of the issue of security assurances to the non-nuclear-weapon States Parties.
All non-nuclear-weapon States parties must provide this information to the Agency on a timely basis.
