Examples of 'nuclear weapons would' in a sentence
Meaning of "nuclear weapons would"
nuclear weapons would - implies a hypothetical scenario or supposition stating what would happen or what the consequences would be if nuclear weapons were present or utilized
How to use "nuclear weapons would" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
nuclear weapons would
Nuclear weapons would be rendered useless overnight.
The threat or use of nuclear weapons would.
Nuclear weapons would thus become superfluous.
A treaty banning nuclear weapons would do so.
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot ofmoney.
Whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in.
Nuclear weapons would be further delegitimized.
The total elimination of nuclear weapons would undoubtedly take time.
Nuclear weapons would be cheaper.
Bohr recognised early that nuclear weapons would change international relations.
Nuclear weapons would arrive within one to twelve months.
For terrorists to obtain nuclear weapons would also represent a grave threat.
Nuclear weapons would not be able to protect us from them.
The ultimate elimination of nuclear weapons would be achieved at the end of a gradual process.
Nuclear weapons would be removed from all surface ships and.
See also
Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of a nuclear war.
Nuclear weapons would pose a threat to the survival of humanity as long as they existed.
A treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons would offer many benefits.
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot of money.
States long ago realized that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would gravely undermine their security.
The use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic humanitarian effects.
NATO must acknowledge that use of nuclear weapons would be a war crime.
Iraq having nuclear weapons would not have been a reason to invade.
Both candidates have stressed that an Iran with nuclear weapons would be unacceptable.
Proliferation of nuclear weapons would be more dangerous in regions with tension.
Besides, not everyone is convinced that the elimination of nuclear weapons would bring peace.
Proliferation of nuclear weapons would be more dangerous in regions where tensions are high.
Although fusion power uses nuclear technology, the overlap with nuclear weapons would be limited.
Its acquisition of nuclear weapons would radically alter the strategic balance.
Nuclear weapons would make the threat posed by the Iranian regime all the more severe.
Put simply, the use of nuclear weapons would result in fewer casualties.
Obtaining nuclear weapons would complete its agenda of domestic crackdown and foreign crises.
Ultimately, the only guarantee that nuclear weapons would not be used was their total elimination.
Any use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic humanitarian consequences and violate international law.
Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war . ".
Surely nuclear weapons would not have been used in defense of the USS Liberty.
If Iran did indeed have nuclear weapons would it be attacked?
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot o ' money.
But where is the evidence that nuclear weapons would prevent the economic war and blockade?
Which nuclear weapons would be the first to go under a Stein administration?
Non-proliferation 2 . The proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously increase the danger of nuclear war.
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot of money. To who, son?
A world free of nuclear weapons would be a global public good of the highest order.
An Iran with nuclear weapons would increase this risk even further.
Any new Russian nuclear weapons would stay within the limits of existing treaties.
Free-fall nuclear weapons would no longer be a credible deterrent.
Meanwhile, existing nuclear weapons would be destroyed and a system of international.
Eliminating non-strategic nuclear weapons would be a decisive measure to prevent terrorism by nuclear weapons.
Non-strategic nuclear weapons would be a natural part of the general nuclear disarmament process.
Moreover, the use of nuclear weapons would violate our obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Nuclear
Show more
Nuclear proliferation continues to be a threat to international security
The spread of nuclear weapons must be stopped
Nuclear test conducted recently at mururoa atoll
Examples of using Would
Show more
Of course we would bring her straight home
That is exactly what a liar would say
Countries would have preferred more time
Examples of using Weapons
Show more
Weapons come in all shapes and sizes
We possess the weapons used in his capture
Weapons have never been part of that equation
