Examples of 'review authors' in a sentence
Meaning of "review authors"
review authors: This phrase pertains to the individuals who have written or contributed to evaluating and critiquing a particular piece of work, such as a book, movie, product, or service. Review authors provide assessments, feedback, and opinions to help others make informed decisions
How to use "review authors" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
review authors
Fourteen review authors selected studies independently.
This was undertaken independently by two review authors.
The review authors found no trials of other approaches.
Any disagreement was resolved by discussion among review authors.
We resolved differences between review authors by discussion and consensus.
Retrieved studies were analysed independently by both review authors.
Review authors are independent and must declare conflict of interests.
Disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus among review authors.
A minimum of two review authors independently assessed each study.
Data extraction was completed independently for included studies by two review authors.
Two review authors independently assessed the available evidence.
A summary of what the review authors searched for and found.
Two review authors independently extracted the test result data.
Too few studies were identified for review authors to attempt sensitivity analyses.
Three review authors assessed the studies for inclusion in the review.
See also
Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion between the review authors or an independent arbitrator.
One or both review authors assessed eligibility and trial quality.
Trials were evaluated for risk of bias and appropriateness for inclusion by the review authors.
Two review authors independently abstracted relevant population and intervention characteristics.
Data extraction has been undertaken by two review authors working independently and simultaneously.
Three review authors searched studies and assessed full texts independently.
Full papers were obtained for relevant articles and both review authors studied these.
Data were insufficient for review authors to assess their effects on postoperative mortality.
A second review author checked data extraction and disagreements were resolved after discussion between review authors.
Two review authors assessed clinical relevance and resolved any disagreements by consensus.
Training and support for Cochrane review authors.
The same two review authors independently screened full reports of selected citations.
Growing resistance to powerful medications cause for concern, review authors say.
Two independent review authors were assigned to assess the methodological quality of individual trials.
These infections are associated with high death rates in a hospital, the review authors said.
The review authors sought to summarise and quantify the overall effects of chemoprevention.
Data were extracted and analysed independently by two review authors ( MG and HM ).
The review authors followed generally sound methods in the conduct of the review.
Data were entered by two review authors ( double data entry ).
All review authors extracted data independently for the one eligible trial.
The challenge, therefore, is for review authors to recognize those situations.
The review authors also studied how anxiety and fear are controlled in the brain.
After searching for all relevant studies, review authors included eight studies involving a total of 1,260 women.
Both review authors decided if the identified studies met the inclusion criteria or not.
Data collection, two review authors independently extracted data and conduc.
The review authors assessed the effect of these medicines on pain and their side effects.
The review authors could not find any studies that adequately assessed these interventions.
Two review authors independently screened the reference lists of identified trials and related reviews.
Review authors in pairs individually retrieved data from published reports and after correspondence with investigators.
Two review authors independently assessed whether trials identified from the searches were eligible for inclusion.
Two review authors assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
The Cochrane review authors concluded that women should no longer be offered these treatments.
The Nicolia review authors ignore or dismiss these findings without sound scientific justification.
Two review authors inputted the data at Review Manager.
Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate?
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Review
Show more
Review of the execution of the design phase
I will not review all that again
Review of implementation of the programme of work for
Examples of using Authors
Show more
Possible authors and attribution of subsequent practice
The problem is the authors lost control
Authors are interfaces between earth and heaven
