Examples of 'reviewers should' in a sentence
Meaning of "reviewers should"
reviewers should: Implies a recommendation or expectation for individuals evaluating something
How to use "reviewers should" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
reviewers should
Reviewers should perform this analysis independently.
Any information provided to reviewers should be considered confidential.
Reviewers should conclude with a summary of their assessment.
Recommended reviewers should be.
Reviewers should be experienced in validation processes.
At least two independent reviewers should assess SRs for quality.
Reviewers should excuse themselves in case of conflicts of interest.
Authors should stay patient and reviewers should act as fast as possible.
These reviewers should be asked to address specific questions.
The governing bodies and the network of reviewers should be gender balanced.
External reviewers should be recruited in advance.
Basic principles to which peer reviewers should adhere to,.
All reviewers should be academically qualified to review an article.
In addition, at least one of these reviewers should be from the GPC.
Reviewers should begin with their evaluation of the application.
See also
When examining articles, reviewers should strive for maximum objectivity.
Reviewers should respect the confidentiality of the assessment process.
Reviewing articles, the reviewers should strive for maximum objectivity.
Reviewers should destroy copies of manuscripts after submitting reviews.
Selected independent external reviewers should review the study - ideally from the beginning.
Reviewers should not consider.
To avoid conflicts of interest, external reviewers should not,.
Anonymity of reviewers should be maintained during the review process.
The reviewers should respect the confidentiality of the revision process.
I do not think that reviewers should ever send separate comments to the editor.
Reviewers should not have a conflict of interest with the proposal.
In summary, researchers and reviewers should ask, How well was validity established?
Reviewers should not make any conclusions as to the legality of conduct.
The reviewers should.
Reviewers should critically evaluate content and form of the manuscript.
Authors and reviewers should consult our Code of ethics.
Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have.
The selection of the reviewers should be the responsibility of the GMA secretariat.
Reviewers should make every effort to complete a review in the time requested.
Interested reviewers should visit WEB to register.
Reviewers should be tactfully encouraged to provide constructive rather than wholly negative critiques.
A full list of reviewers should be made available on the Platform 's website.
Reviewers should pay more attention to their reviews to improve the quality of their work.
Giving their recommendations, Reviewers should consider the categories which Editors use for classifying papers,.
Reviewers should make all reasonable effort to submit their report and recommendation on time.
For this reason reviewers should not repeat the external referee ( s ' ) statements.
Reviewers should also expect to be thanked for the time they take to review manuscripts.
Suggested reviewers should not share an institutional affiliation with any of the authors.
Reviewers should be professionals and trained ; nobody is born a reviewer.
Flight Reviewers should avoid confirming an answer.
Reviewers should maintain the confidentiality of the review process ;.
A full list of reviewers should be made available on the Platform & apos ; s website.
Expert reviewers should provide the comments to the appropriate lead authors through the secretariat.
The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame.
Thus, reviewers should be even more rigorous in their evaluations.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Reviewers
Show more
The reviewers noted several good practices
The comments of the reviewers will be enclosed
The reviewers were satisfied with this approach
