Examples of 'sirkeinen' in a sentence
Meaning of "sirkeinen"
Sirkeinen: a noun that does not have a commonly known definition or context
How to use "sirkeinen" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
sirkeinen
Pokela for mrs sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen presented the following compromise text.
The amendments tabled by Ms Sirkeinen were then discussed.
Ms Sirkeinen proposed the following compromise text.
He agreed with the amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen suggested a clarification which was accepted.
Deleted in line with amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen contributed to the ensuing general discussion.
Delete the last sentence Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen agreed to the deletions proposed.
He agreed to take on board the amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen proposed reading this paragraph as follows.
Vever voting rights of Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen agrees but is concerned by the budget issue.
The section rejected the following amendments tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen.
See also
Ms Sirkeinen presents her opinion at the plenary session.
The assembly first considered the following amendment from Mrs Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen spoke in favour of the amendment.
The president moved that the Committee turn to the amendments tabled by Ms Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen asked for information on this matter.
The president then put to the vote the amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen agrees with the two previous speakers.
Mr Hahr introduced the amendments tabled by Ms Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen refers to the differences between the transport sectors.
Contributions to the discussion were given by Ms Sirkeinen and Mr Osborn.
Mrs Sirkeinen agreed by and large with the amendment.
Amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen was adopted.
Mrs Sirkeinen stated that her amendment sought greater clarity.
Beale voting rights of Mrs Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen proposed that this paragraph should read as follows.
Amendment tabled by Mrs Sirkeinen was accepted.
Mrs Sirkeinen agreed that some form of intervention mechanism was needed.
Vever proxy for Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen and the rapporteur agreed on the final wording.
This was accepted by Mrs Sirkeinen.
Ms Sirkeinen also requested that the documents sent to members be dated appropriately.
The presentation was followed by a debate in which Mr Seinen and Ms Sirkeinen participated.
Ms Sirkeinen complimented the rapporteur on the opinion and stressed several points.
The precautionary principle mentioned by Mrs Sirkeinen obliged the EU to act.
Ms Sirkeinen wished to clarify a passage in the document submitted to the Bureau for a decision.
Future EU spending has to support andunderpin sustainable development by Ulla Sirkeinen.
Mrs Sirkeinen justified this amendment primarily on the grounds of consistency and clarity.
Mr Hernández Bataller and Ms Sirkeinen took part in the ensuing debate.
Ms Sirkeinen supported the idea of considering the form of a guideline for this paper.
In the debate that followed Mr Zboril and Ms Sirkeinen spoke and mentioned the following.
Ms Sirkeinen hoped that greater emphasis would be placed on the potential of energy efficiency.
As a result of the discussion, Mrs Sirkeinen suggested deleting the whole sentence.
Mrs Sirkeinen said that she had had differences of opinion with the rapporteur.
The rapporteur proposed a modified version of the amendment, against which Mrs Sirkeinen spoke.
Ms Sirkeinen emphasised that a roadmap should be developed involving the different sectors of the economy.
