Examples of 'syntactic sugar' in a sentence
Meaning of "syntactic sugar"
syntactic sugar: In programming, syntactic sugar refers to syntax within a language that makes the code easier to read or express but does not add any additional functionality
Show more definitions
- Additions to the syntax of a computer language that make code easier for humans to read or write, but that do not change the functionality or expressiveness of the language.
How to use "syntactic sugar" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
syntactic sugar
It is syntactic sugar that really is not that useful.
The using statement is syntactic sugar.
They are syntactic sugar over constructor functions.
Ruby has a lot of syntactic sugar.
Is syntactic sugar for.
This is called syntactic sugar.
Cascading is syntactic sugar that eliminates the need to list the object repeatedly.
Ruby allows operator overloading as syntactic sugar for simple method calls.
So I have said that functions with multiple parameter lists are syntactic sugar.
The function r is syntactic sugar for the function that prints a newline character.
Line 9 shows an example of a special kind of syntactic sugar.
This format is purely syntactic sugar and has no behavioral differences with the linear format.
Therefore, it is seen as syntactic sugar.
DCG notation is just syntactic sugar for normal definite clauses in Prolog.
Provider recipe is the base of all the providers, which are just syntactic sugar.
See also
I understood that DCG notation is just syntactic sugar for normal definite clauses in Prolog.
As you can see, the use of self . title is nothing more than syntactic sugar.
Ada, is simply syntactic sugar for else followed by if.
When your language is nowhere near Turing-complete, syntactic sugar can be your friend.
This is syntactic sugar to avoid needing to use typename,.
Well, do is actually just syntactic sugar over monads.
One example of syntactic sugar may arguably be the classes used in object-oriented programming languages.
In fact, the changes were more syntactic sugar than anything else.
Monads are defined as ordinary datatypes, but Haskell provides some syntactic sugar for their use.
Semantically, they are just syntactic sugar for a normal function definition.
Actually, the above add is nothing but syntactic sugar for this,.
JavaScript classes are syntactic sugar for prototype-based OOP.
Things like name. attr and name[index] are just syntactic sugar for method calls.
Overloaded operators are syntactic sugar for function calls,.
I know it 's only syntactic sugar.
In COBOL, many of the intermediate keywords are syntactic sugar that may optionally be omitted.
Right, but that's just syntactic sugar.
In the C language, the a notation is syntactic sugar for * a + i.
So the " I " is merely syntactic sugar.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Sugar
Show more
Sugar cane is never sweet at both parts
Ships took my sugar and left me tears
Sugar is once again putting something up quickly
Examples of using Syntactic
Show more
Syntactic foams made from synthetic resins
Readability is achieved by syntactic and conceptual minimalism
Morphosyntactic and syntactic properties of intensifier adjectives
