Examples of 'terrorism should' in a sentence
Meaning of "terrorism should"
This phrase implies that terrorism is considered undesirable, and the speaker believes it should not exist or be tolerated. It suggests a viewpoint that condemns and opposes acts of terrorism
How to use "terrorism should" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
terrorism should
The threat of terrorism should be given priority.
There is no international consensus as to how terrorism should be defined.
Conventions against terrorism should be implemented by everybody.
Terrorism should stop around the world.
The ones promoting terrorism should be punished.
Terrorism should not be linked to a particular culture or religion.
The fight against terrorism should be global.
Terrorism should therefore be dealt with by collective means.
It was suggested that terrorism should be included as such a crime.
Terrorism should be clearly defined as outside the law.
Thus the fight against terrorism should be comprehensive.
Terrorism should not be supported by anybody at any time.
The concepts of resistance and terrorism should not be confused.
Victims of terrorism should also be afforded sympathetic treatment.
The threat of terrorism should.
See also
Jihadist terrorism should be fought and defeated militarily.
A system of compensation for the victims of terrorism should be established.
All forms of terrorism should therefore be condemned unequivocally.
Double standards in the fight against terrorism should cease.
Extremism and terrorism should be fought against.
The efforts of the international community to combat terrorism should be intensified.
Victims of terrorism should be duly considered in this regard.
The radical sects that are promoting terrorism should be destroyed.
Combating terrorism should fall into this category.
International framework of cooperation against financing for terrorism should be established.
The problem of terrorism should not be viewed in isolation.
The need for a comprehensive convention on international terrorism should be evident.
Extremism and terrorism should not be simply interlinked.
It calls into question what the appropriate response to terrorism should be.
Terrorism should not be identified with particular cultures or religions.
The question was whether terrorism should be combated or be allowed to triumph.
Terrorism should not be allowed to hold human rights hostage.
Civil violence and terrorism should not be called fascism.
Terrorism should not be confused or equated with liberation struggles.
Our policy response to terrorism should be broad and multifaceted.
Terrorism should be done away with.
Future efforts to combat terrorism should continue to be guided by that principle.
Terrorism should be streamlined and financed by one single programme.
The fight against global terrorism should fall to all countries.
Terrorism should never triumph.
I am a strong believer that terrorism should be countered with legitimacy and justice.
Terrorism should not be associated with any particular religion or culture.
They do know now that terrorism should be the number one option.
Terrorism should not be identified with any particular religion or ethnic group.
The absence of a definition of terrorism should not hold up action against terrorism.
Terrorism should go.
The measures we adopt to fight terrorism should not affect that process.
Combating terrorism should be approached primarily as a criminal law enforcement issue.
Specialized training programmes for personnel involved in combating terrorism should be developed.
That definition of terrorism should include the following elements.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Terrorism
Show more
Terrorism as such could not of course be condoned
Extension of the concept of terrorism to ordinary offences
Terrorism law is thus in no way devoid of subtleties
