Examples of 'test-retest' in a sentence
Meaning of "test-retest"
test-retest (adjective) - a type of reliability assessment where the same test is administered to the same group of people on two different occasions to evaluate consistency of results over time
How to use "test-retest" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
test-retest
Design of the test-retest reliability study.
Test-retest reliability correlations appear to be acceptable.
It is measured based on the test-retest coefficient of reliability.
The test-retest reliability is fair to marginal.
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good.
The test-retest result indicated a high coefficient of reliability.
Demonstrates good test-retest reliability.
The test-retest reliability of the instrument was also evaluated.
One of the analyses investigated was test-retest reliability.
Test-retest correlation provides an indication of stability over time.
Reliability was supported by internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
A reliability test-retest was carried out and will be published timely.
Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and stability test-retest.
The test-retest indicated the temporal stability of the instrument.
This was additionally evidenced by high correlation between test-retest measures.
See also
The test-retest values were significant for the four scales mentioned.
In order to test reproducibility, the researchers applied test-retest reliability.
Furthermore, the cortical test-retest parameters displayed good to moderate reproducibility.
Two psychometric properties were investigated, internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Test-retest reliability and measures of internal consistency yielded satisfactory results.
This finding reasserts the test-retest reliability of the spiritual scale.
Test-retest reliability involves assessing the same patient several times.
The average of three attempts has the highest test-retest reliability.
The test-retest reliability shows the stability of an instrument in the long run.
The instrument has construct validity and reasonable test-retest reliability.
Test-retest reliability results were higher for the evaluations related to the hypopharynx.
Most measures of structural properties showed good to excellent test-retest reliability.
To estimate reproducibility or reliability, test-retest and internal consistency methods were used as follows.
The two-other series were successively performed to evaluate test-retest reliability.
The test-retest reproducibility and the responsiveness of the questionnaire were also evaluated.
Content and face validity were confirmed and test-retest reliability was satisfactory.
Test-retest reliability was not assessed because self-efficacy changes with domain experience.
We can use similar standards to evaluate both test-retest and alpha.
Although the test-retest correlations represent a good procedure to measure reliability, there are limitations.
Here we would use the same statistics as for test-retest reliability.
The test-retest reliability of the structured questionnaire was verified using the McNemar test.
Another strategy to determine the reliability of the instrument was test-retest analysis.
Test-retest reliability can be assessed by obtaining a few replicated judgments later in data collection.
Reliability and reproducibility were determined by the test-retest and internal consistence analysis.
A test-retest reliability entails conducting the same questionnaire to a large sample at two different times.
Both these pieces of information reinforce the hypothesis of evidence of test-retest reliability.
The results show excellent test-retest reliability and internal consistency for this tool.
These factors have adequate internal consistency and acceptable test-retest correlation.
Furthermore, test-retest correlations for inappropriacy were significant, indicating that this is a stable conversational characteristic.
To assess the reliability the internal consistency, test-retest and interrater are used.
Test-retest reliability for time of pain onset and limiting pain is low and quite variable.
The four standardized scales were internally consistent and test-retest reliability was satisfactory.
The comparison of test-retest values presented an acceptable level of reproducibility Table 4.
The two values of these stimuli are then correlated to assess test-retest reliability.
Reliability was confirmed using the test-retest and internal consistency methods? and correlation between factors.
