Examples of 'trials compared' in a sentence
Meaning of "trials compared"
trials compared: This phrase indicates a comparison or evaluation of different trials or experiments to analyze and contrast their results, methods, or outcomes. It is commonly used in scientific research, clinical trials, or experiments to draw conclusions about the effectiveness, impact, or differences between various trials or test results
How to use "trials compared" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
trials compared
The trials compared the efficacy of rod.
One trial compared photocoagulation to submacular surgery and two trials compared different lasers.
Seven trials compared different surgical interventions.
The first appropriately randomised clinical trials compared TENS and massage via negative pressure.
Two trials compared aerobic exercise to resistance training.
We were unable to conduct meta-analysis because the trials compared different medications.
All included trials compared acupuncture versus no intervention.
Randomized open-label non-placebo-controlled trials compared with medical therapy.
All of the trials compared against standard treatment.
Three trials compared laser trabeculoplasty with trabeculectomy.
In our review, no two trials compared the same pair of operations.
No trials compared acupuncture or acupressure versus other active treatments.
Very few clinical trials compared to its active metabolite, modafinil.
Two trials compared budesonide to placebo in maintaining response induced by budesonide.
A total of 14 trials compared NRIs with placebo.
See also
These trials compared the safety and efficacy of monthly administration of.
Several small randomized trials compared balanced crystalloids with 0.9 % saline Table 3.
Eight trials compared slings with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension.
These randomized trials compared KT versus sham taping or other interventions.
Two trials compared supplements to additional nutritional advice and one to no intervention.
Thirty-three trials compared individual counselling to a minimal behavioural intervention.
The trials compared the efficacy of IntronA used alone or in combination with ribavirin.
Two very different trials compared anabolic steroid versus control ( no anabolic steroid or placebo ).
Two trials compared a dummy pill to a drospirenone pill with low estrogen.
A small number of trials compared acupuncture plus a non-drug treatment to the same treatment alone.
Seven trials compared late treatment with functional appliances versus no treatment.
Nineteen trials compared different whitening products with each other.
All trials compared the effects between morning and evening statin administration.
The trials compared different methods addressing the various controversies mentioned above.
Three trials compared probiotics to mesalazine and one trial compared probiotics with placebo.
Five trials compared a CIC with a different combined injectable.
Both trials compared recombinant human activated factor VII with placebo.
The trials compared the efficacy of Viraferon used alone or in combination with ribavirin.
Recent trials compared the performance of sawmill operators working with and without Oscar.
Six trials compared Chinese herbal medicine in combination with antipsychotic with antipsychotic drugs alone.
Two trials compared different types of active CPT.
Seven trials compared some form of enhanced OHA with some form of routine OHA.
Most trials compared an intervention to placebo ( a dummy treatment with no active medication ).
Five trials compared similar chemotherapeutic regimens, except for the anthracycline.
As some trials compared different agents and different doses, some patients contributed to two analyses.
All the trials compared true acupuncture with sham acupuncture, conventional treatments and no treatments.
Only two trials compared the same chemotherapeutic interventions and therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate.
All trials compared the provision of MNP for point-of-use fortification with no intervention or placebo.
All of the trials compared ICS / LABA combination inhalers with LABA and ICS as individual components.
All 10 trials compared the proportions of individuals tested.
All trials compared against open appendectomy, whether by classic incision ( McBurney ) or infraumbilical.
The trials compared lipid-lowering therapy with placebo or usual treatment for at least 90 days.
Two trials compared glucocorticosteroids with azathioprine ( 41 and 10 participants respectively ).
Six trials compared NSAIDs with placebo, and included 1354 participants in total.
RESULTS, Nine trials compared topiramate, gabapentin or pregabalin to placebo in 859 unique participants.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Compared
Show more
Lowest compared to other renewable energy sources
I should not have compared you to jane
Compared to a katana all other swords are toys
Examples of using Trials
Show more
Conducted trials and exercised appellate jurisdiction
Guilty pleas reduce the length of trials
Human trials are a vital part of modern medicine
