Examples of 'was no statistically' in a sentence
Meaning of "was no statistically"
was no statistically: Indicates that there was not enough evidence or data to support a statistical conclusion
How to use "was no statistically" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
was no statistically
There was no statistically significant difference compared to placebo.
The third study reported that there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference in arithmetic abilities.
Comparing measures of rest between genders also was no statistically significant difference p.
There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups.
For the other variables, there was no statistically significant correlation.
There was no statistically characteristic difference between the sexes.
In relation to age and education, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference between these data.
Regarding the other variables, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference for these values.
As far as the environment is concerned, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference among types of ICUs.
For other practices and outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference in readmission and mortality.
See also
was no specific
was no statistical
was no statistically significant
was no statistically significant difference
For the indicator percentage of absences, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference in the consolidation rate.
When compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference in terms of hospital mortality.
As to school grade and class period, there was no statistically significant difference.
But there was no statistically significant increase in risk of fracture.
Results, both groups showed a significant improvement and there was was no statistically sign.
In all cases there was no statistically significant correlation.
There was no statistically significant difference between cases and controls.
Regarding acute and chronic inflammation, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
There was no statistically significant change in viability.
Among the groups which received amifostine there was no statistically significant difference Figs . 4 and 5.
There was no statistically significant relationship in any of the crosses performed.
For a third medicine, Pfizer 's antidepressant Pristiq ( desvenlafaxine ), there was no statistically significant difference in prescribing.
There was no statistically significant difference between men and women.
In the analysis between sex and pacifier use, there was no statistically significant association p 0.421.
There was no statistically significant difference in vaccine status per gender.
According to the Fisher Test result p 0.89, there was no statistically significant difference.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
In ct volumetric analysis there was no statistically significant difference between groups.
There was no statistically significant difference in the comparisons of the anthropometric variables studied.
In terms of the P300 component, there was no statistically significant difference between the genders.
There was no statistically significant difference in mortality at the end of the study.
It can be observed that there was no statistically significant difference between genders.
There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
After the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
There was no statistically significant relationship.
With regard to demographics, there was no statistically significant difference between groups at baseline.
There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events.
In the present study, however, there was no statistically significant association between these variables.
There was no statistically significant variation between the two observers.
Figure 4B shows that there was no statistically significant difference for p53.
There was no statistically significant association between appropriate / inappropriate phonological profiles with the evaluated characteristics.
Regarding respiratory mechanics, there was no statistically significant changes in Crs, Rrs and prs Table 2.
There was no statistically significant difference between the mean of postpartum women by parity p.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Statistically
Show more
Neither of these findings is statistically significant however
Statistically significant changes in several variables were observed
This difference is statistically and substantively significant