Examples of 'weapons would' in a sentence
Meaning of "weapons would"
weapons would: suggests the hypothetical or conditional use of weapons, indicating what could happen or what would be done if certain circumstances occur
How to use "weapons would" in a sentence
Basic
Advanced
weapons would
Nuclear weapons would be rendered useless overnight.
They clearly knew weapons would advance.
Less weapons would mean less deaths.
The threat or use of nuclear weapons would.
Nuclear weapons would thus become superfluous.
A treaty banning nuclear weapons would do so.
Western weapons would be useless against this.
Einstein was asked to predict what weapons would be used in a.
Using hidden weapons would be an dishonorable act.
Imagine what just one massive attack with chemical weapons would do.
The use of these weapons would be suicide.
The weapons would be consistent with that scenario.
And that conventional weapons would be useless against it.
Weapons would be buried under a tree to seal a peace agreement.
Handing out weapons would be illegal.
See also
Weapons would help.
Intercepting these weapons would be huge.
Nuclear weapons would be further delegitimized.
Stricter laws to the carrying of weapons would be necessary.
Chemical weapons would be stored at the base.
Sleiman did not specify what weapons would be purchased.
Your weapons would be useless against it.
Any soldier found missing his weapons would be punished.
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot of money.
There is no reason for them to believe their metal weapons would be any more effective.
Two nuclear weapons would be worth a lot ofmoney.
A treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons would offer many benefits.
And those weapons would fetch a very good.
States long ago realized that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would gravely undermine their security.
Even the weapons would be very hard to trace.
An enemy with an arsenal of artifact weapons would not only be dangerous.
Those weapons would be very helpful.
The total elimination of nuclear weapons would undoubtedly take time.
These weapons would be a combination of cannon and missiles.
The possession of atomic weapons would guarantee it this role.
The weapons would include orbital weaponry and space weapons.
Electromagnetic impulsion weapons would destroy electronic equipment.
The weapons would kill every living thing on Earth in five years.
I hoped that your weapons would be more effective.
The question from RT Moscow was whether I thought assault weapons would be banned.
We pray that weapons would be silenced.
Both candidates have stressed that an Iran with nuclear weapons would be unacceptable.
Chemical weapons would not have been.
NATO must acknowledge that use of nuclear weapons would be a war crime.
Laser weapons would only make matters worse.
Nobody thought that those weapons would last that long.
And our weapons would be kept at a distance from us.
Whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in.
The weapons would all be registered.
To create more effective weapons would they not have used it.
You'll also be interested in:
Examples of using Would
Show more
Of course we would bring her straight home
That is exactly what a liar would say
Countries would have preferred more time
Examples of using Weapons
Show more
Weapons come in all shapes and sizes
We possess the weapons used in his capture
Weapons have never been part of that equation
